Announcement: Second Annual International and Comparative Disaster Law Essay Contest, 2017
Call for Abstracts
This announcement calls for the submission of abstracts not exceeding 500 words for consideration for the second annual “International and comparative disaster law essay contest.” This contest is cosponsored by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), the American Society of International Law Disaster Law Interest Group (ASIL DLIG), the Jean Monnet Module on “International and EU Law” at Roma Tre University and the International Disaster Law Project (IDL) of the Universities of Bologna, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Roma Tre and Uninettuno.
Over the last decade, “natural” disasters, such as floods, earthquakes, droughts and tsunamis, killed over 1.1 million people and affected nearly 2 billion worldwide, often affecting poorer countries disproportionately. In response to related challenges, there have been several major global initiatives developed which are aimed at addressing these issues. These include the Sendai Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, the Sustainable Development Goals 2015, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, the World Humanitarian Summit 2016 accompanied by the Grand Bargain, the Draft Articles on the ‘protection of persons in the event of disasters’ developed by the UN International Law Commission, and technical assistance provided by the IFRC and its partners to implement tools such as the IDRL Guidelines and the Checklist for Law and DRR at the domestic level.
Due to advances in the science of disaster risk management, we now know that there are no true “natural disasters.” Many “natural” hazards are sparked or accelerated by human activity and no matter how “natural” the hazard, it is human exposure, vulnerability, resilience and preparedness that define whether a given event results merely in a rainy day or a national catastrophe. Unlike the weather, human behaviour can indeed be regulated.
Scholarship about legal and regulatory frameworks for reducing disaster risks, responding to disasters and recovering from them, is still in its infancy. Yet states are increasingly turning to legal tools to fight disasters, at the national, regional and international levels. Are they learning from each other about what works well and what does not? Are international instruments meeting their potential to increase cooperation in disaster risk management and humanitarian response? Are international legal tools being translated effectively to the national level in terms of implementation and enforcement? Further details about disaster law, together with details of the key binding and non-binding legal instruments, are available at www.ifrc.org/dl and http://www.ieudl.eu/databases/
This essay contest aims to stimulate creative thinking and analysis about disaster law, in relation to these and other questions, from an international and/or comparative perspective. The first annual contest, held in 2015, drew submissions from 12 countries. The winning essay was: Giovanni Sciaccaluga, whose paper was entitled Climate change related disasters and human displacement: towards an effective management system (2015).
This year, the contest has been modified as a two-part process:
Step 1) The contest partners are firstly calling for submission of abstracts not exceeding 500 words on any of the questions described below, or related areas of interest (see below the section on ‘Sample topics’ for further clarification). Abstracts should be received no later than 7 July 2017.
Step 2) After the abstracts have been reviewed, the judge’s committee will invite the contributors of the most promising five abstracts to submit full essays of no more than 6,000 words (including a 150 word (maximum) abstract and including all footnotes) by 31 October 2017.
Eligibility and requirements:
- The contest is open only to (1) students enrolled in an undergraduate or graduate degree program (as master or PhD students) at any university (anywhere in the world) at the time of submission; or (2) to students who have graduated from such programmes within 12 months of the final date of their registration period. Those whose abstracts are selected for essay submission will be required to produce documentary evidence of their registration as students.
- Essays may examine any issue related to law and disasters, but must do so either from an international or a comparative law or perspective, or both. Comparative essays should examine laws or legal issues from no less than two countries. A sample list of potential topics is included below. This is merely for the purposes of illustration; you may select a topic and research question(s) of your own choosing which falls within the broad eligibility parameters.
- Abstracts (and the essays) must be written solely by the candidate(s), in English, and may not have been submitted for publication elsewhere. This restriction will be lifted after the contest is completed, and, for the winners and “honourable mention” papers, after publication as IFRC Working Papers. Papers may have more than one author, but not more than three authors, so long as all authors meet all the criteria listed here.
- The abstract should include the following detail: (1) what issues you are going to examine, identifying the research question(s)/topics to be explored in the essay (due to the maximum length of the essay of 6000 words it is advised that competitors do not try to engage with more than two principal questions/topics); why you have selected these issues (i.e. why they are important, including to the development, implementation, enforcement etc. of disaster law); what the main legal issues are which need to be addressed; how you are going to examine these issues in terms of your approach (e.g. if comparative research, briefly explain which countries you have selected, why and how you plan to examine them; what types of binding and non-binding legal instruments you plan to frame your research around etc.). Abstract submissions must not exceed 500 words.
- Submitted essays should be analytical and not merely descriptive i.e. they should not merely identify and describe issues, legal instruments and challenges relating to them, but also discuss why such challenges exist, what the implications of them are, how such challenges might be addressed and overcome, and so forth.
- Any recognised citation style (e.g. Oscola, Cambridge University Press, Harvard) may be used.
Deadlines and method of submission
- The deadline for the submission of the abstract is 11:59 p.m. Central European Time, 7 July 2017. Participants will be notified if their abstract has been selected by July 31, 2017.
- The deadline for the submission of the essay, for those abstracts that have been selected, is 11:59 p.m. Central European Time, 31 October 2017.
- Abstracts and essays should be submitted to firstname.lastname@example.org as Microsoft Word attachments. In the subject line, please state “Submission: International and Comparative Disaster Law Essay Contest”. Questions may be directed to the same email address.
- By submitting papers, candidates represent that they fulfil the eligibility requirements of the competition.
- All candidates will receive an e-mail confirming that their submissions (whether abstracts or essays) have been received. They may not be contacted again until winners are selected.
Award and announcement of the winning essay
The winner of the contest will receive:
- A monetary prize in the amount of Euro 500.
- A free annual membership in the American Society of International Law.
The winner will also have his or her paper published as a “Working Paper” of the IFRC’s Disaster Law Programme. They will retain copyright of their papers and may subsequently publish them elsewhere, according to the terms of the Working Papers series.
Other “honourable mention” papers, as selected by the final jury and if of appropriate quality, may be published as a “Working Paper” of the IFRC’s Disaster Law Programme. They will retain copyright of their papers and may subsequently publish them elsewhere, according to the terms of the Working Papers series.
A message announcing the name of the winner and runners up of the contest will be sent to all members of the ASIL DLIG, as well as to the co-sponsors and made public on the ASIL website. An e-mail with the final outcome will also be sent to all who submitted papers.
Competition procedures and selection criteria
- On a separate first page, each entry should include: the title, author’s name, author’s mailing address, email address, and phone number, university name and address, and expected graduation date. In addition, contestants should include the following sentence, along with a submission date and signature of the author(s): “[Name of author(s)] is the sole author(s) of this paper and complies with all requirements of this contest. This abstract has not been submitted for publication elsewhere.”
- A submitted essay will be regarded as ‘published’ and therefore not eligible if it has been accepted for publication by a journal or book, or otherwise posted online. Students are welcome to submit 4 essays based on coursework that was undertaken during their degree programs so long as they meet all of the other eligibility requirements.
- The title and abstract only should be repeated on the second page. No identifying information (including name, name of university, etc.) should be included anywhere other than on the first page.
- Reviewers and judges will be selected by agreement of the co-sponsors of the contest.
As noted above, participants are free to choose any topic they wish that is related to law and disasters. Please note that for purposes of this essay contest, the term disasters refers to ‘natural’ disasters (i.e. meteorological, hydrological etc.) and ‘man-made’ disasters (e.g. technological, pollution etc.), but does not include situations of war and armed conflict, unless considered as part of a ‘complex’ disaster situation. The following are a few potential themes provided only by way of illustration:
- What impact do existing disaster law treaties have on domestic disaster management?
- What are the added values and shortcomings of the recently adopted ILC’s Draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disaster?
- Can mandatory insurance rules reduce disaster risks in developing countries?
- Is there a customary duty to seek international assistance when local resources are overcome by a disaster?
- How can legislation improve post-disaster economic recovery?
- Should the rules for humanitarian assistance be different in conflicts and disasters?
- What are the legal implications of practice developed by international human rights bodies in relation to disaster scenarios?
- What is the role of domestic courts in improving the safety and resilience of communities?
- What are the pros and cons of a rights-based approach to disaster response?
- What are the prospects for a comprehensive global treaty on international disaster assistance? Should there be a global system of certifying humanitarian NGOs?
- Why aren’t land use rules and building codes preventing more deaths and losses? What special protections do indigenous peoples require with respect to disasters?
- How do derogations and limitations to human rights in disasters affect outcomes for affected persons?
- What is the right balance between sovereignty and protection when it comes to international disaster response?
- What are the most reasonable and successful governmental approaches to post-disaster compensation to affected persons?
- How can we reduce legal barriers to speedy and equitable housing solutions after disasters?
Download here the Flyer of the Contest
Download here the Annoucement of the Contest
Feeling like a winner?
There are lots of opportunities to try out your writing expertise throughout the year...sometimes for money (oh and prestige and worldwide fame of course...).
Times Law Award
The biggest of these is The Times Law Award; an annual award of £3500 for a 1000 word essay on a given topic.
Details of the 2015 competition are available via both The Times and One Essex Court.
2014 saw first and third place taken by current City students, with second awarded to a BPTC alumnus. George White (1st) and Lara Hassell (3rd) are both BPTC students (Lara completed the GDL last year) and James Beeton (2nd), a BPTC alumnus. The 2014 essay question was Morality versus legality: when is war justified?. All winning essays can be found online, and the news story on the City website.
In 2013 City GDL students secured first and second place in the competition. Andrew Lomas won overall, with Lara Hassell taking second prize with their essays on Privacy and the press: Is state regulation in the public interest? A detailed account of Andrew and Lara's success can be found via the City website.
in 2012 both first and second prizes, as well as two runners-up prizes were won by lawyers with links to City. The title of the essay was as topical as ever: Cameras in court: justice's loss or gain? First prize was taken by James Potts, City GDL and BPTC alumni and now pupil barrister at 4-5 Grays Inn Square. Read James' essay. Second prize was taken by Thomas Coates, then a City GDL student. Read Thomas's essay.
In 2011 first prize was won by Anthony Pavlovich, from City's Graduate Diploma in Law course. Anthony addressed the question Justice under the axe: can the Government's cuts be fair?
In 2010 first prize was won by a City GDL student, Anita Davies, (who went on to take the BPTC with us). Anita addressed the question: Supreme Court UK: radical change or business as usual? This very prestigious award usually has a judging panel of gravitas; this one included Jack Straw; Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, the President of the Supreme Court; Lord Grabiner; James Harding, Editor of The Times and David Cavender, QC, of One Essex Court.
Anita's winning essay, described by Jack Straw as "an engaging, erudite piece of prose". can be seen on the One Essex Court website.
In 2006, Amy Rogers, another City GDL student won the award with her essay on Terrorism v human rights: Where do you draw the line?,Sarah Love (City GDL), won joint first prize in 2005 with The shape of things to come? Will Clementi be good for consumers but bad for lawyers?, James Brilliant (City BVC) won it in 2004 with Constitutional reform: will the justice system benefit?Mathew Guillick (City GDL) in 2002 with International terrorists: what role should the law play? and finally in 2001, Jonathan Davey(City GDL) with Ethical dilemmas who should decide - lawyers, scientists or God?. Not a bad record eh?
All previous prize winners (including runner-ups) of The Times Award can be found on the One Essex Court site, who the awards are held in association with.
The Graham Turnbull Memorial International Human Rights Essay Competition
An annual competition named after Graham Turnbull, an English solicitor who did much to promote respect for human rights. Graham was killed in 1997, working as a human rights monitor on the United Nations Human Rights Mission in Rwanda.
Open to law students, trainee solicitors, pupil barristers and all solicitors/barristers within 3 years of admission/call.
The competition asks for essays of no more than 2000 words in length and awards the winner of this prestigious award £500 from the Graham Turnbull Memorial Fund.
The winner for 2013 was Niall Coghlan, a GDL student from City, and you can view his essay along with those of other shortlisted candidates (including runner-up and fellow City alumnus Jennifer Blair) via the Law Society website Entries from earlier years can also be found via the website.
The deadline for this year's competition is 13th February 2015, with entrants asked to tackle the following question:
"The roots of many of our basic rights go back to the Magna Carta whose 800th Anniversary is being celebrated in 2015. Given this important legacy, to what extent would proposals to repeal the Human Rights Act 1998 and pull out of the European Convention on Human Rights impact on the protection of human rights in the UK and around the world?"
Bar Council Law Reform Essay
Sponsored by the Bar Council Scholarship Trust, this competition is open to students and pupils and requires entrants to write a piece of less than 3000 words proposing the case for a law reform which is desirable, practical and useful. Top prize is £4000 which could come in very handy for funding some part of your legal education.
City GDL students have won in previous years: Daisy Ricketts (2011) and Calum Docherty (2010) were both successful. Calum proposed the reform of copyright law in Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Reforming Fair Dealing in English Copyright Law and Daisy with Strengthening the Rule of Law: Reforming the Scope on Parliamentary Privilege. In 2012 City student Mek Mesfin was runner-up in the CPE category and in 2013 Ross Beaton, a City GDL alumni won the overall prize. You can see all previous winners and read their essays via the Bar Council website.
Phoebe Whitlock won in the GDL category for 2016's competition with an entry entitled Rivalling Silicon Valley: The case for the reform of Software Patents. Take a look at the CityNews story about this. For the 2017 competition, GDL student Clarissa Wigoder won first prize with her essay Spare the rod: Why the law on corporal punishment needs to be reformed, and Daniel Fox was named runner-up with his piece: I hate being idle: Asylum seekers and the right to work.
Take a look at their entries (and all other winners) via the Bar Council website.
Lord Rodger Essay Prize
This annual essay prize is sponsored by OUP in association with the Statute Law Society. The competition is open to all undergraduates or those holding an undergraduate degree for less than 5 years.
Essays should cover one or more of the following topics:
- the legislative process - the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy - the drafting of legislation - the interpretation of legislation
Word count is between 5000-8000 words, and there's a prize of £1000 on offer. There is also the possibility of the winning essay being published in the Statute Law Review. Deadline for the competition is usually mid-September - find out more via the Statute Law Society website.
Please note - this competition didn't run in 2014 or 2015. We shall see if it re-emerges!
Access to Justice Foundation Student Competition
The Foundation and LawWorks run this annual competition, calling for students to write articles between 750-1000 words. Winners will receive the Student Prize and have their piece published in the New Law Journal.
The competition deadline is generally in February time. Students were asked to answer the following question for last year's competition: An understanding of the importance of pro bono and access to justice is a crucial part of any law student's education. How can this be improved?
The competition is open to both undergraduate and postgraduate law students, including LPC, BPTC and CILEx students. We'll update this once this year's competition is released but you can see last year's information via the Foundation website.
UK Supreme Court Blog Essay Competition
Launched by the UK Supreme Court Blog, in conjunction with the UK Supreme Court and the Guardian, this essay competition asked students to write essays of 1000 words in a blog-style from a choice of two topics. The 2013 competition asked students:
'Judging the constitution: what role should the UKSC play in determining the constitutional law of the UK?' or 'Rogue justice:do we need more or fewer dissenting voices in the UKSC?'
Winners got the chance to see their essay on the UKSC Blog and on the Guardian website. This was in addition to a week's work experience at Olswang LLP, an iPad mini and £250 cash. Not bad eh?
In 2013 this competition was won by City GDL student Daniel Isenberg. It did not run in 2014.
JLD Essay Competition
Open to its members, the Junior Lawyers Division of the Law Society, have an annual competition for those registered with the Solicitors Regulation Authority. This includes LPC students and those qualified and working as paralegals.
Those wishing to enter the 2017 competition should write no more than 2000 words on the following question:
Where is the line between legitimate accountability and calling judges ‘enemies of the people’?
Deadline is 30th November 2017.
For inspiration you might like to look at the winners/runners-up for last year, where entrants had to tackle the following question:
How do you think Brexit will affect junior lawyers?
2015 winners (and their essays) are available via the JLD website.Entrants addressed the following question:
Should there ever be a case for absolute anonymity in legal proceedings, and if so, why and for whom?
Overall winner for 2015 was Anna Dannreuther, trainee solicitor and City GDL alumni. Well done Anna!
UKELA Andrew Lees Prize
Named for a former Friends of the Earth Campaign Director (Andrew Lees, a leading environmental campaigner who died unexpectedly in 1994) this prize has been going many years. You can view previous winners on the site and the winner normally receives support for travel and attendance at the UKELA annual conference as well as see your work published in their members' journal.
The deadline for submissions is usually around early April of each year.
Find out more about the competition and associated rules on the UKELA website.
- Update* 2016 question been released: The Paris Climate Agreement is based on what countries say they will do, and not on what they must do, to avoid catastrophic climate change. It is too little, too late?
Deadline = 11 April 2016
Find out more via the website or flyer.
Five Stone Buildings Essay Competition
The Pupillage Committee of the Chambers of Henry Harrod, 5 Stone Buildings run an annual essay competition, with students asked to write up to 1500 words on a chosen topic. It didn't run last year but the 2013-14 question was as follows:
To what extent is the lack of certainty as to the remedy that will be granted in a successful proprietary estoppel claim problematic in principles and in practice?
There is usually £500 up for grabs for the winner, along with the invitation to undertake a mini pupillage at the chambers.
Generally the question appears in January, with the deadline in late April.
See the rules and more information from the last time this competition ran at the website of 5SB. Let's see what happens this year!
ARDL Marion Simmons QC Essay Competition
Annual essay competition from the Association of Regulatory and Disciplinary Lawyers. Students (undergraduates and postgraduates, trainee solicitors and pupil barristers) are asked to write no more than 3000 words on a topic. The 2014/15 title is as follows:
Has the regulation of professionals encroached too far into private life?
First prize winner takes home £2000, second prize winner £1000 and third prize £500.
Find full details of how to enter via the ADRL website.
CEPLER Student Essay Competition
The Centre for Professional Legal Education and Research at Birmingham Law School (CEPLER) launched its national law student essay writing competition in 2014. The winner (City GDL student Chris Richards) received an iPad mini and the opportunity to have their essay published on the CEPLER website as a CEPLER Working Paper. He had just 1500 words to tackle the following title: “In an age of austerity, access to justice is a luxury", and received comments like this from the judges:
"Chris' submission was a beautifully written, well-argued and original essay which all three of us chose as the best in a competitive field". (The Chief Executive of Birmingham Citizen's Advice Bureau Service)
In 2015 students were asked to tackle the following question:
"A 'brexit' would be a serious threat to London as the centre of globalised legal services. Discuss" Deadline was 19th November 2015. The winning entry can be seen via the CEPLER website.
More info and the competition rules can be found via the CEPLER website.
Want inspiration?Read Chris's winning entry via the University of Birmingham's ePapers repository.
FIDE Essay Prize
The UK Association for European Law also run an essay competition, with the winner securing a bursary to attend the biennial FIDE CONGRESS Conference, which usually takes place in May.
Last year students were asked to write no more than 2000 words (including footnotes) on the following:
Does recent case law suggest that the Court of Justice has lost its way on the issue of EU citizens' rights?
Submissions are judged by a panel from the UKAEL committee, who will award the winner registration at the conference in addition to £600 towards accommodation and travel. The winner of this prize in 2014 was Niall Coghlan, BPTC student at City, you can read his essay via the UKAEL website. Niall has had a great year for developing his European Law expertise - he was also part of the team that won the European Human Rights Moot in Strasbourg.
Commonwealth Law Student Essay Competition
This annual competition is open to all students registered on an undergraduate degree course.
The organisers the Commonwealth Legal Education Organisation (CLEO) are asking for 2500 words maximum on the following:
Can the Commonwealth (Latimer House) Principles on Three Branches of Government 2003 serve as an effective framework for safeguarding democracy and the rule of law in Commonwealth Countries?
Find out more and access the rules online.
Future Legal Mind Award
Launched in 2014 by the National Accident Helpline in association with Lawyer2b magazine, this competition offers £5000 towards future studies to one undergraduate and one postgraduate law student. In addition there's a work experience placement at the London or Manchester office of solicitor firm Colemans-CTTS.
Entrants need to submit an essay of up to 1000 words - the winning essays will be published in full on the Lawyer2B website.
Find out more via the National Accident Helpline website. Worth registering on the website in order to be alerted of the essay titles, once launched in early November 2015.
The 2015 winner in the postgraduate category was Lukas Hamilton-Eddy (City GDL student); by registering with Lawyer2b you can read his winning essay.
The 2016 prize was again won by a City GDL student, Tom Phillips. He wowed judges with his essay on the future of legal services for firms and consumers. You can read Tom's essay by registering with Lawyer2B via their website. Another City student, Pavlos Artemios Xagoraris also made the finalists stage. Pavlos is in the first year of his Graduate Entry LLB.
Property Bar Association Essay Competition
This competition was launched in November 2015 and asks students each year to write a 1000-word essay, with the winner taking home £1000, a copy of Megarry & Wade AND their essay published in the Estates Gazette. Watch this space (or that of the Property Bar Association...)
The question for 2017-18: 'Has leasehold has its day?' (deadline 5th January 2018 at 6pm).
Legal Cheek Journal Prize
For 2017 the focus of this competition is Cyber Crime. Legal Cheek suggest this could be through examining a story in the news, by considering key legislation — such as the Serious Crime Act 2015 — and/or exploring case law governing this area. Other related angles are also welcome. Entries can be about cyber crime anywhere in the world, and any relevant law which is applicable.
Entrants have been asked to write no more than 1000 words on the topic, with a return transatlantic flight on offer for the winner! The sponsor is BARBRI International.
Deadline 1st May 2017 - find rules and submission details via Legal Cheek.
ELSA Amicus Essay Prize
This competition asks entrants to address the following question in no more than 1500 words: “Using the landmark judgment of Soering v UK as a starting point, critically analyse the position of the European Court of Human Rights in cases concerning extradition of individuals facing death penalty in states which are not members of the Convention”
Amicus ALJ, with assistance from ELSA UK and ELSA Ireland, will compile a shortlist of essays on the recommendation of the Panel. This shortlist will be sent for consideration by the final judge and Amicus ALJ Trustee, Mark George QC, who will declare the winning essay and the runner-up essay.
First prize is a Work Experience Placement in Amicus ALJ’s London office, duration and date to be decided between both parties. Additionally, the winning essay shall be featured in the upcoming edition of the Student Comparative and European Law Review (SCELR). The author of the runner-up essay will be awarded a prize of £150 worth of OUP books or a Law Trove module, at their discretion, courtesy of Oxford University Press. Both entrants will be awarded complimentary membership of their respective ELSA national group for the upcoming term.
Find full details of the competition via the SCELR website but any questions should be directed to email@example.com. Deadline 7th Dec 2017.